Bone, the Innocent vs. Anney, the Ignorant

After reading chapters 1-10 of “Bastard Out Of Carolina” by Dorothy Allison, I have accumulated much sympathy for Bone. She is an innocent child and from what it seems thus far, she just wants some positive attention and some love from her mother and the people around her. I think that because of the fact that she observes everything and keeps everything internalized to herself, that this causes her to be vulnerable to others. I feel that this is why she is more easily picked on at school, why she stands out from her family and tells evil stories, and even is the reasoning why Glen sexually assaults her rather than her sister Reese. Not that Bone is asking to be raped, because she certainly is not, however I feel that Reese is described to be stronger and more ladylike similar to a southern belle in these first chapters, and is therefore less vulnerable to others.

I do not feel any sympathy for Anney and almost feel ashamed of her when I am reading. I feel that her situation is a no-brainer, one in which should not take much thought or any hesitation. If my own daughter was getting beaten by my husband, I would leave him. It does not matter that she does not know or is not certain about the sexual assaults, it still is wrong of Anney to stay with Glen. She is putting her daughter’s life in danger. As a mother, she is not fulfilling her position or duty in Bone’s life. Regardless of whether or not she loves Glen, Anney should put her daughter’s happiness and life before her own, as any good mother would. As an older sister to two boys, I know that I would give up my life for either of them because they are the world to me. I do not understand how Anney can just sit back and watch someone hurt her “baby” who she claims to love so dearly. It just does not make sense to me.

Even after finding out that Bone’s collarbone was broken, along with her coccyx, Anney still does nothing to confront Glen or to leave him. She just stays at Alma’s house for a while and then returns back home after two weeks, after she feels that he has learned his lesson. When reading about this event I couldn’t help but thinking over and over again in my head: “Is she stupid?!?” For I can not imagine going back to a man like that, let alone marrying one. I also feel that Anney’s family is partially to blame for Bone’s situation. They see what is going on, yet they do not step up and say anything to Anney. Although Ruth has a talk with Anney, I feel that this was not at all productive for she just beat around the bush a lot rather than being straightforward and telling Anney that she believes that Bone is being raped by Glen. I believe that Anney is very close to her family and if they all stepped up and said something to her about the situation, then she would not be able to keep on making herself believe that they are one happy family. Instead, she would leave Glen and the problem would be fixed. I hope dearly that Anney will soon leave Glen so that Bone will have a chance to lead a somewhat normal life.

Summer is Right Around The Corner..and Sun Burns as Well

Since we started discussing some of the Dickey poems in class, I decided to give another one a shot, and to try to interpret it on my own once again. Though my interpretations of my poems thus far have not been completely correct, I figure that practice makes perfect. So here goes nothing…

After I read the poem “Sun” by James Dickey, I almost felt the pain of getting sun burnt in the summer. When reading about this couple going out sun tanning (and I am assuming on a beach) and getting badly burnt to the point where it hurt, I felt a lot of sympathy for them. Being that I am very pale skinned and often have experienced becoming white as a ghost as it is said that the “winter had caught her and whipped her,” I have experienced the wrath of a brutal sun burn at least once a summer. I also laughed because they obviously were not smart enough to put very much sun screen on. The woman’s nose is described as “still clownish” meaning that she only placed sun block on her nose, which caused it to be the only place on her body, except for where her bathing suit had covered her, that was white.

I also found it comical that the man was described as being “red as iron glowing blazing up anew with each bad breath from the bellowing curtains.” I recalled summers where my dad had looked like a lobster because he did not protect himself from the sun. He had such heat radiating off of him, even hours after he was exposed to the sun, that the sun burn would hurt even more any time the wind blew or something touched him. Although it was complete agony for him, as kids my brother and I used to draw things on his back or arms and watch it slowly fade away, back into the redness. I also can relate to seeing whiteness all over and having your eyesight slightly altered after being in the bright sun all day, as described in the passage: “And in the mirror saw whiteness run from my eyes like tears…”

I enjoyed reading this poem, because it not only was easy to understand (at least I think it was, if I got the meaning of it) but it also was simple enough to relate to. At the end of the day when I spent the entire day at the beach, and I can not move for I am burnt to a crisp, the first thing I want to do is lie down and go to sleep as this couple did. “Sun” was a very slow-moving poem, where you just take in all of the senses described, and just the love that the couple has for one another. They just comfort each other as they help their spouse get ready for bed. I really took pleasure in reading about the sweet and tender aspect of this poem, plus the thought of summer soon coming and the days at the beach soon to come. J

James Dickey, A Spiritual Writer

After reading a couple of the James Dickey poems, I feel that he writes a lot about death, Heaven, and God. For example, the poem called “Walking on Water” which appealed most to me thus far seemed to have a deeper meaning. There is a very large connection to spiritual images throughout the poem which lead me to think of some higher being or God. I feel as though he was writing about Jesus walking on water, while others watched in awe.

When Dickey references “the shining topsoil” I believe that he means the Earth and that Jesus is the “miracle” that he speaks about, who was put on Earth. I also feel that the poem implies that no one is perfect and that even Jesus made mistakes or had a “wrong step of sliding.” Dickey makes references to the Earth and Heaven by utilizing language such as “two open blue worlds”. In addition, James Dickey talks about a “shark pursuing” as well, which I strongly believe is symbolic of the Devil. In the poem, the shark threatens the very life of the “miracle” person and therefore is symbolic of the great threat in which the Devil is to Christianity.

Throughout the poem, I believe that Dickey is sharing the story of Jesus Christ and how he came to Earth, and will come again on the “Great Judgment Day” as it is known to many who believe in him. For me, Jesus is the only individual that I can think of who would not leave footprints behind, yet “the shimmering place of an infinite step upon water.” This is as if saying that although there is no hard proof or evidence that Jesus did in fact exist, there is evidence in those who believe in him. Jesus is also often described as “shining” or “sparkling” images which are words used to describe the person in the poem. The return of Jesus I feel, is indicated in the passage “until I return in my ghost.” Jesus’ return is then followed by the talk about Judgment Day by phrases such as “balancing child”, “amazed”, and “led by the nose into heaven.” The “balancing child” is Jesus, who has to decide whether or not we go to Heaven or Hell and who leads us into Heaven if we are worthy of going there. The people on Earth are the ones that will be “tight-lipped” and “amazed” when he comes, for they will be like a deer caught in the headlights. No one truly is able to understand what you are supposed to do, or how you must act when he does indeed come again and thus is responsible for why they are going to act this way out of awe for him. From reading this poem “Walking on Water” in particular, as well as a few others, they lead me to believe that James Dickey is a very religious, spiritual man who likes to express his beliefs through his poems.

Movie vs. Script - "A Streetcar Named Desire"

The movie “A Streetcar Named Desire” really brought the script to life and made the viewer able to really relate to the characters involved. For example, Blanche seemed so much more emotionally unstable because of her past experiences in the movie, than I imagined she was just from reading it. Watching the movie, I felt much sorrier for her. Stanley, I felt, was really exaggerated and played the antagonist much more strongly in the movie. He was the muscular, cocky, no good “Polack” who took advantage of Blanche and broke her unstable state of mind so that Blanche was no longer able to see any of reality.

In the film, there were many alterations made to the story line. For example, it begins with Blanche going to the bowling alley to first meet Stella rather than meeting her in her home as was described in the play. I feel that this is done in order to show the loving connection between the two sisters before Stanley is brought into the picture. Another change that was made was that they showed Mitch and Blanche in some room after dancing, rather than back at Stella and Stanley’s house as it had been set up in the script. I feel that this was changed in order to be sensitive to the time that it was made in. if the film had been set in Stella’s house and Mitch tried to put his hands on Blanche, it would have been much more scandalous and not accepted by the viewers. In the film, Mitch and Stanley were also shown in the factory when Mitch is informed all about Blanche’s bad ways. This was added to the film I believe, in order to portray how shocked Mitch was and how much it killed him to hear this new information because he was in love with her. This caused viewers to feel sorry for him and for Blanche because they would no longer be getting married and living “happily ever after together” as most people want stories to end.

I feel that many of the changes made to the film, were done for dramatic effect. The film was created so that it would be accepted for that time, yet also so that it upheld general assumptions and gender stereotypes. For example, at the end of the play, Stella comes running outside with her baby and says that she will never go back to Stanley, whereas in the script she let Stanley comfort her and she stayed with him. In the film, I believe that the change was made in order for the audience to sympathize more with Stella “the innocent Southern belle” rather than Stanley who did not uphold any of the old southern ideals. The film put a much more feminist tilt on the script and caused the audience or at least me personally, to relate more to (and therefore side with) Blanche and Stella.